<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stock Market Predictions: I Wish!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.predictioneersgame.com/stock-market-predictions-i-wish/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.predictioneersgame.com/stock-market-predictions-i-wish</link>
	<description>Using the Logic of Brazen Self-Interest to See and Shape the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:58:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.predictioneersgame.com/stock-market-predictions-i-wish/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictioneersgame.com/?p=143#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the comment. I have clearly not stated my case adequately. I do not mean to suggest that markets are unpredictable in general; only that they are not predictable by my model. My model assumes more than rationality. It also assumes that it is examining a situation involving the opportunity for negotiation in the shadow of the potential threat of the use of coercion or threats. In a pure market setting this condition is not met. It is met when it comes to predicting, for instance, how regulators and regulations may influence markets because regulators often have threat-power. Each additional assumption to a model necessarily restricts the domain of things it applies to. I am coinfident that there are many clever economists and others using game theory to play markets. that just is not what my particular models are designed to do.
Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jonathan,<br />
Thanks for the comment. I have clearly not stated my case adequately. I do not mean to suggest that markets are unpredictable in general; only that they are not predictable by my model. My model assumes more than rationality. It also assumes that it is examining a situation involving the opportunity for negotiation in the shadow of the potential threat of the use of coercion or threats. In a pure market setting this condition is not met. It is met when it comes to predicting, for instance, how regulators and regulations may influence markets because regulators often have threat-power. Each additional assumption to a model necessarily restricts the domain of things it applies to. I am coinfident that there are many clever economists and others using game theory to play markets. that just is not what my particular models are designed to do.<br />
Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Sandlund</title>
		<link>http://www.predictioneersgame.com/stock-market-predictions-i-wish/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Sandlund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.predictioneersgame.com/?p=143#comment-35</guid>
		<description>If you believe people are rational, and thus predictable, is it not fair to assume the market must be rational as well? Afterall, it is merely a function of its participants. 

I have to say, I disagree with the notion that people, and the market for that matter, are rational but I see a disconnect in your theory that people are predictable but markets are not... 

Even though we disagree, I&#039;ve thoroughly enjoyed reading your material! Best, 

Jonathan Sandlund</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you believe people are rational, and thus predictable, is it not fair to assume the market must be rational as well? Afterall, it is merely a function of its participants. </p>
<p>I have to say, I disagree with the notion that people, and the market for that matter, are rational but I see a disconnect in your theory that people are predictable but markets are not&#8230; </p>
<p>Even though we disagree, I&#8217;ve thoroughly enjoyed reading your material! Best, </p>
<p>Jonathan Sandlund</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

